Modern History Sourcebook:
A.J. Balfour (1848-1930):
Defense of the Palestine Mandate, 1922
A.J.
Balfour (1848-1930) was British Prime Minister from 1902-1905 and later the Foreign
Secretary responsible for the "Balfour Declaration". In 1922 he responded
to an attack on the British promise to the Jewish People in this speech.My noble friend told us in his speech, and I believe him absolutely, that he has
no prejudice against the Jews. I think I may say that I have no prejudice in their favour.
But their position and their history, their connection with world religion and with world
politics is absolutely unique. There is no parallel to it, there is nothing approaching to
a parallel to it, in any other branch of human history. Here you have a small race
originally inhabiting a small country, I think of about the size of Wales or Belgium, at
any rate of comparable size to those two, at no time in its history wielding anything that
can be described as material power, sometimes crushed in between great Oriental
monarchies, its inhabitants deported, then scattered, then driven out of the country
altogether into every part of the world, and yet maintaining a continuity of religious and
racial tradition of which we have no parallel elsewhere.That itself, is sufficiently remarkable, but consider-it is not a pleasant
consideration, but it is one that we cannot forget-how they have been treated during long
centuries, during centureis which in some parts of the world extend to the minute and the
hour in which I am speaking; consider how they have been subjected to tyranny and
persecution; consider whether the whole culture of Europe, the whole religious
organization of Europe, has not from time to time proved itself guilty of great crimes
against this race. I quite understand that some members of this race may have given,
doubtless did give, occasion for much ill-will, and I do not know how it could be
otherwise, treated as they were; but, if you are going to lay stress on that, do not
forget what part they have played in the intellectual, the artistic, the philosophic and
scientific development of the world. I say nothing of the economic side of their energies,
for on that Christian attention has always been concentrated.I ask your Lordships to consider the other side of their activities. Nobody who knows
what he is talking about will deny that they have at least - and I am putting it more
moderately than I could do - rowed all their weight in the boat of scientific,
intellectual and artistic progress, and they are doing so to this day. You will find them
in every University, in every centre of learning; and at the very moment when they were
being persecuted, when some of them, at all events, were being persecuted by the Church,
their philosophers were developing thoughts which the great doctors of the Church embodied
in their religious system. As it was in the Middle Ages, as it was in earlier times, so it
is now. And yet, is there anyone here who feels content with the position of the Jews?
They have been able, by this extraordinary tenacity of their race, to maintain this
continuity, and they have maintained it without having any Jewish Home.What has been the result? The result has been that they have been described as
parasites on every civilization in whose affairs they have mixed themselvesvery useful
parasites at times 1 venture to say. But how~ ever that may be, do not your Lordships
think that if Christendom, not oblivious of all the wrong it has done, can give a chance,
without injury to others, to this race of showing whether it can organize a culture in a
Home where it will be secured from oppression, that it is not well to say, if we can do
it, that we will do it. And, if we can do it, should we not be doing something material to
wash out an ancient stain upon our own civilization if we absorb the Jewish race in
friendly and effective fashion in these countries in which they are the citizens? We
should then have given them what every other nation has, some place, some local
habitation, where they can develop the culture and the tradi~ tions which are peculiarly
their own.I could defend - I have endeavoured, and I hope not unsuccessfully, to defend this
scheme of the Palestine Mandate from the most material economic view, and from that point
of view it is capable of defence. I have endeavoured to defend it from the point of view
of the existing population, and 1 have shownI hope with some effect, that their prosperity
also is intimately bound up with the success of Zionism. But having endeavoured to the
best of my ability to maintain those two propositions, I should, indeed, give an
inadequate view to your Lordships of my opinions if I sat down without insisting to the
utmost of my ability that, beyond and above all this, there is this great ideal at which
those who think with me are aiming, and which, I believe, it is within their power to
reach.It may fail. I do not deny that this is an adventure. Are we never to have adventures?
Are we never to try new experiments? I hope your Lordships will never sink to that
unimaginative depth, and that experiment and adventure will be justified if there is any
case or cause for their justification. Surely, it is in order that we may send a message
to every land where the Jewish race has been scattered, a message which will tell them
that Christendom is not oblivious of their faith, is not unmindful of the service they
have rendered to the great religions of the world, and, most of all, to the religion that
the majority of your Lordships' House profess, and that we desire to the best of our
ability to give them that opportunity of developing, in peace and quietness under British
rule, those great gifts which hitherto they have been compelled from the very nature of
the case only to bring to fruition in countries which know not their language, and belong
not to their race. That is the ideal which I desire to see accomplished, that is the aim
which lay at the root of the policy I am trying to defend; and, though it be defensible
indeed on every ground, that is the ground which chiefly moves me.
Source:
Reprinted in Brian McArthur, Penguin Book of Twentieth Century Speeches (London: Viking Penguin, 1992), pp. 88-90.
This text is part of the Internet
Modern History Sourcebook. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and
copy-permitted texts for introductory level classes in modern European and World history.
Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright.
Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational
purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No
permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook.
The Internet History Sourcebooks Project is located at the History Department of Fordham University, New York. The Internet
Medieval Sourcebook, and other medieval components of the project, are located at
the Fordham University Center
for Medieval Studies.The IHSP recognizes the contribution of Fordham University, the
Fordham University History Department, and the Fordham Center for Medieval Studies in
providing web space and server support for the project. The IHSP is a project independent of Fordham University. Although the IHSP seeks to follow all applicable copyright law, Fordham University is not
the institutional owner, and is not liable as the result of any legal action.
