Modern History Sourcebook:
Joseph Stalin (1879-1953):
Industrialization of the Country, 1928
Between 1928 and 1933, Stalin inaugurated the First and Second Five-Year Plans to
achieve his goal of rapid industrialization. In many respects he was successful - by 1939
the USSR was behind only the United States and Germany in industrial output. The human
costs, however, were enormous.The question of a fast rate of development of industry would not face us so acutely
as it does now if we had such a highly developed industry and such a highly developed
technology as Germany, Say, and if the relative importance of industry in the entire
national economy were as high in our country as it is in Germany, for example. If that
were the case, we could develop our industry at a slower rate without fearing to fall
behind the capitalist countries and knowing that we could outstrip them at one stroke. But
then we should not be so seriously backward technically and economically as we are now.
The whole point is that we are behind Germany in this respect and are still far from
having overtaken her technically and economically.The question of a fast rate of development of industry would not face usso acutely if we were not the only country but one of the countries of the dictatorship
of the proletariat, if there were a proletarian dictatorship not only in our country but
in other, more advanced countries as well, Germany and France, say.If that were the case, the capitalist encirclement could not be so serious a danger as
it is now, the question of the economic independence of our country would naturally recede
into the background, we could integrate ourselves into the system of more developed
proletarian states, we could receive from them machines for making our inclustry and
agriculture more productive, supplying them in turn with raw materials and foodstuffs, and
we could, consequently, expand our industry at a slower rate. But you know very well that
that is not yet the case and that we are still the only country of the proletarian
dictatorship and are surrounded by capitalist countries, many of which are far in advance
of us technically and economically.Internal conditions. But besides the external conditions, there are also
internal conditions which dictate a fast rate of development of our industry as the main
foundation of our entire national economy. I am referring to the extreme backwardness of
our agriculture, of its technical and cultural level. I am referring to the existence in
our country of an overwhelming preponderance of small commodity producers, with their
scattered and utterly backward production, compared with which our large-scale socialist
industry is like an island in the midst of the sea, an island whose base is expanding
daily, but which is nevertheless an island in the midst of the sea.External conditions. We have assumed power in a country whose technical
equipment is terribly backward. Along with a few big industrial units more or less based
upon modem technology, we have hundreds and thousands of mills and factories the technical
equipment of which is beneath all criticism from the point of view of modem achievements.
At the same time we have around us a number of capitalist countries whose industrial
technique is far more developed and up-to-date than that of our country. Look at the
capitalist countries and you will see that their technology is not only advancing, but
advancing by leaps and bounds, outstripping the old forms of industrial technique. And so
we find that, on the one hand, we in our country have the most advanced system, the Soviet
system, and the most advanced type of state power in the world, Soviet power, while, on
the other hand, our industry, which should be the basis of socialism and of Soviet power,
is extremely backward technically. Do you think that we can achieve the final victory of
socialism in our country so long as this contradiction exists?What has to be done to end this contradiction? To end it, we must overtake and outstrip
the advanced technology of the developed capitalist countries. We ha,~e overtaken and
outstripped the advanced capitalist countries in the sense of establishing a new political
system, the Soviet system. That is good. But it is not enough. In order to secure the
final victory of socialism in our country, we must also overtake and outstrip these
countries technically and economically. Either we do this, or we shall be forced to the
wall.This applies not only to the building of socialism. It applies also to upholding the
independence of our country in the circumstances of the capitalist encirclement. The
independence of our country cannot be upheld unless we have an adequate industrial basis
for defence. And such an industrial basis cannot be created if our industry is not more
highly developed technically.That is why a fast rate of development of our industry is necessary and imperative.We cannot go on indefinitely, that is, for too long a period, basing the Soviet regime
and socialist construction on two different foundations, the foundation of the most
large-scale and united socialist industry and the foundation of the most scattered and
backward, small commodity economy of the peasants, We must gradually, but systematically
and persistently, place our agriculture on a new technical basis, the basis of large-scale
production, and bring it up to the level of socialist industry. Either we accomplish this
task-in which case the final victory of socialism in our country will be assured, or we
turn away from it and do not accomplish it-in which case a return to capitalism may become
inevitable.
Source:
From Joseph Stalin, "Industrialization of the Country and the Right Deviation in
the C.P.S.U., November 19,1928," in J.V Stalin, Works, vol. 11, 1928-March
1929 (Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1954), pp. 257-58, 261-63.
This text is part of the Internet
Modern History Sourcebook. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and
copy-permitted texts for introductory level classes in modern European and World history.
Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright.
Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational
purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No
permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook.
© Paul Halsall, July 1998
The Internet History Sourcebooks Project is located at the History Department of Fordham University, New York. The Internet
Medieval Sourcebook, and other medieval components of the project, are located at
the Fordham University Center
for Medieval Studies.The IHSP recognizes the contribution of Fordham University, the
Fordham University History Department, and the Fordham Center for Medieval Studies in
providing web space and server support for the project. The IHSP is a project independent of Fordham University. Although the IHSP seeks to follow all applicable copyright law, Fordham University is not
the institutional owner, and is not liable as the result of any legal action.
© Site Concept and Design: Paul Halsall created 26 Jan 1996: latest revision 20 January 2021 [CV]
|
